Sylvia Browne, a very known psychic reader in the US, made a very unpleasant prediction about the possible fate of Shawn Hornbeck. Shawn was kidnapped at the age of 11, in late 2002. Sylvia appeared on TV on the "Montel Williams Show" in February 2003 and told Shawn's parents that he was dead and advised as to where to search for his body, which has led to shifting search team's efforts in that direction. It's painful to imagine how the family must have lost all hope after her reading.
This January Shawn was found alive just miles from his home living with a man who's kidnapped him.
The family of the kid also tells that Sylvia tried to offer more advice at the rate of $700 for half an hour.
This story doesn't make a good reputation to the psychics. Sylvia Browne is famous psychic, appearing on TV, writing books on the subject, who's been many times accused of being a fraud. I don't know enough about doing psychic readings but it surely doesn't look well.
What are your thoughts of Sylvia Browne and of psychic readings in general?
For more detailed information about this incident you can read She told them boy was dead from NY daily times.
Discuss this and other posts in the mind-energy.net forum.
People who are not perceptive will get drawn into her. I couldn't understand why Montell Williams could not see it!!! He is a great guy from what I see on TV and I cannot believe that this phoney fraud was able to manipulate him in. I always felt that way about her. There are others that I feel could be the real thing, but her I got bad vibs that she was exploiting people's weaknesses. I know I am right.
whats wrong with that? The psychic part is up for debate, the message though is beautiful. The glass is half full for me.
Don't jump on the hate wagon. Take what you want and leave the rest.
Silvia Brown is a fraud and I have quit watching Montel because he is promoting her. They should both be fined and banned from society.
I think if you want a true analysis, one should start a blog for people that have had questions answered by her to see how many times Sylvia was accurate.
She is simply evil. I know there are people with gifts out there, but SYLVIA? She is a fraud, and you are just as at fault to support Sylvia, because it's people like you who gives her popularity and enables her to continuously deceive
people.
We should all send Montel William letters to stop him from putting her on air. This is a grave matter. She is really dangerously evil.
Also - to James McDaniels & 1.2, 1.2.1, & 1.2.1.1. , aka: Squeaky From & her gang, or could it be Sybil's 1,2&1,2 again? You people need help, but you won't get it from SB,
may I suggest your clergy man? Better yet, maybe you should try someone else's. A gift from God that SB charges $1400. an hour to extort money from helpless people who are living the nightmare & deep emotional pain of not knowing where there 11 year old son is? You call telling those people their son was dead, a message of love? It's not - trust me, I know. Maybe you people are beyond help.
I am truly struggling with this one. A reading can be helpful guidance and reassurance, but I don't think you can depend on it to make your major life decisions.
There is a very fine line between trying to help someone with psychic guidance and giving them the kind of answers that Browne does. It goes a little too far to be so completely bold faced about it.
Everyone has to be responsible for their own decisions.
I do readings as well, but I tell my clients that I don't really like to read for anyone more than once every 6 months or so. It is too easy to let them become dependant on me to solve all of their problems.
I have always avoided anything like missing persons and police work, because I know many things, but I don't feel that I get quite enough information to give those bold-faced definate answers. I wouldn't want to give false hope, take away hope, or influence an investigation in the wrong direction. If I were ever to get involved I would have to make sure I was damn certain of what I was talking about, and I would be very honest about how sure I was, and the odds of my being right about what I was saying. My honest estimation is that most psychics are only right about 75% of the time.
Look at her charges for security fraud. Read the interview with her first husband, who denies she had psychic ability when they were together. He said she does not have a masters in literature that she claims to have from a University that doesn't exist. Read of the majority of times she is wrong eg telling one woman her mother is dead when she is alive. Telling another woman that her kidnapped granddaughter was taken to Japan as a sex slave and her body was found just a few km's from her home. She is a lying fraud perpetrating her get rich through the pain of others, scheme. Shame on her.
It says "I'll charge you $700 an hour and make up crap for you to hear".
She's an emotional vulture preying on the desperate and vulnerable.
What kind of moral deviant gives out information of such a profound manner that they "aren't always sure" is going to be right? By their own admission, psychics (including thousands of supporters using the same tired excuse), "don't always get it right." Lord, we've all heard it a million times.
Ok, so maybe, just maybe, you'd want to shut your pie hole before telling parents that their son was dead until you actually knew if you were right, or if this was one of those "sometimes we get it wrong" deals.
The most mind-boggling and repugnant aspect of psychics (and I am yet to see one who doesn't take a similar stance) is that they apparently live in a moral vacuum and refuse to take responsibility for their own actions (i.e. the glue of the social fabric and the entire foundation of Western political and philosophical thought). Instead, they rather meekly defer their responsibility to an "unseen spirit guide". "It's not my fault", they might say, "I'm just a mouthpiece... I just pass on what I am told". Apparently, they don't have any duty of care regarding what this information might do, the effects it might produce or even if it is RIGHT (and who can know? After all "they're not always right". Can you tell me ahead of time when this inaccuracy occurs? No? Huh.. thought you were psychic). This is reprehensible! Even CHILDREN know they have to accept responsibility for their actions; that there are consequences to words and that they shouldn't pass on vicious gossip unless they're sure.
This, if you were wondering, is why many skeptics etc will refer to the movement as "ugly". Here, motive or belief is unimportant. I have no doubt that many "psychics" are well-meaning and kind individuals (if somewhat deluded). HOWEVER, simply by adhering to the old psychic adage of being a "mouthpiece", they are inadvertently doing something not only very ugly, but completely rejected and shunned in all other areas of society. The end result is the same - they can destroy lives, cause pain, suffering or set people on unintended paths with incorrect information and then can simply say "oops! just passing on what I heard! My bad!".
Psychics and their supporters need to examine a little thing called cause and effect. Many could not imagine what it would be like to be told your missing son was dead. What if the couple were silly enough to believe a "psychic"? What if they stopped looking for him? JUST THINK what they suffered... and it's NOT just Sylvia Browne and there are thousands of less extreme examples as well. This applies to ALL PSYCHICS EVERYWHERE.
But they're "only human", right? HARDLY. People lacking a conscience or empathy are NOT human. They're sociopaths. Alternatively, well-meaning ones are simply displaying a shameful level of idiocy. IN ALL CASES, extreme arrogance is shown. I'm not sure how else a rational person could interpret these actions. Think about it. Think about how ARROGANT you must be to assert your right to pass on your information when you "sometimes get it wrong" and have no way of knowing when these little "fits" of inaccuracy occur. Like I said, intentions mean nothing. The road to hell is paved in good intentions.
By the same token Sylvia told them where to find the body, "which has led to shifting search team's efforts in that direction." Sure he wasn't dead, because they altered it. If she had not told them then by the time they did search there or find the body then he would have been dead and he would have been there.
Telling the future is a tricky thing. Once we know whats going to happen we have a chance of changing it. IF it doesn't happen then it doesn't necissarily, although possibly, mean that they are wrong. What it means is that because of our reactions to the news we changed what we did enough to make the prediction not come to pass.
And no I am not a psycic nor do I work for Sylvia. I am a 16 year old student who has watched Sylvia Brown a few times with my girlfriend and sort of belive what she is saying. Do not be so quick to attack her, shes been right more times then any of you have, and not about easy things. About other missing persons cases
You said "If you know the future that means theres a good chance it wont happen that way."
So...what's the point of 'knowing the future'?
And if theres a good chance 'it won't happen that way' then will you still be prepared to spend $700?
Example: Your mother is missing.
Is she alive or dead? (Lets' say she ran off to join the circus)
Now suppose Sylvia tells you your missing mother is murdered and lying dead in a land-fill.
Is she right or wrong?
Does looking for your mother at a land-fill with search teams change the fact that your mother actually ran off to join the circus and that Sylvia lied to you to collect your $700?
OR.......
Lets' say that your mother is dead, her corpse is in a landfill.
Yet Sylvia said that your mother ran off to join the circus.
Does checking around all the circuses in town change the fact that your mother is dead in a garbage dump and that Sylvia STILL keeps her $700?
Or are you saying that your mother, who was in the circus just like Sylvia claimed, magically ended up dead and in a garbage dump because you believed Sylvia and wanted to find your mother? Sounds kinda twisted to me.
ESPECIALLY when Sylvia charges $700 and is dealing with grieving relatives who are desperate for answers.
Extraordinary claims require EXTRAORDINARY PROOF.
#7.1 jackie, LOL, you maybe right about Francine making the mistake
Yes, why charge so much when it's supposedly free from Francine and she claimed she received such info to help other people?
I was actually amazed at her abilities from reading her book till I read about the reading for the 9/11 fireman's death. Now I think she's not as pure as she claimed..
Do you believe Sylvia Browne on the Montel Williams show?
http://www.apopularitycontest.com/display_poll.php?ID=157
I do have a very good feeling about Montel. I think he is a truly sincere and good person. I do have a hard time reconciling the fact that he seems to believe Sylvia.
I do not want to be mean to Sylvia. I was amazed, though, at how many respondants had the same feeling I had about her as a psychic. No one is right all the time. For that reason, I would hesitate to make predictions like the one about Shawn Hornbeck. I think if I am going to err it should be on the side of compassion, not sensationalism.
I do not claim to have great psychic ability. I am more of an empath. I can sense people's emotional state and mood with pretty good accuracy. I am sure this comes mostly from being a close observer, but it surely makes me feel freaky sometimes, especially when negative emotions are running high around me. I also tend to get urges to call people on the phone just before they show up at my house or call me.
If I were going to make predictions, and I don't, they would be along the lines of warning of possible consequencies of allowing certain emotions to run someone's life. They would be the sort of things that a parent would attempt to teach an out of control child.E
Well, she has about a 1% success rate so I know she isn't a psychic. I bet Shawn Hornbecks' parents received a lot of comfort we she falsely claimed he was dead!