Pages Navigation Menu

Parapsychology articles and news

Water crystal replication study with Dr. Emoto and Dr. Radin

I believe that if you’re somewhat interested in parapsychology or if you have seen the movie What the Bleep!? – Down the Rabbit Hole (you might like it if you liked The Secret movie or book) then you’ve heard about the study of Dr. Masaru Emoto, where he claims that people’s intentions change the structure of water crystals. 


There was some criticism of the study and Dr. Dean Radin, with Dr. Emoto and other people decided to make a replication of this study, with tighter controls. The research was triple-blind, meaning that nobody knew everything – the people giving intentions, the raters, the photographers and researchers. All this should control for some biases that are usually present in loosly controlled experiments.

Now, Dr. Radin published some results of the research on his blog. Some excerpts:

An experiment tested the hypothesis that water exposed to distant intentions affects the aesthetic rating of ice crystals formed from that water. Over three days, 1,900 people in Austria and Germany focused their intentions towards water samples located inside an electromagnetically shielded room in California. Water samples located near the target water, but unknown to the people providing intentions, acted as "proximal" controls. Other samples located outside the shielded room acted as distant controls.

And some of the results:

Results suggested that crystal images in the intentionally treated condition were rated as aesthetically more beautiful than proximal control crystals (p = 0.03, one-tailed). This outcome replicates the results of an earlier (double blind) pilot test.

Some more information, including good Q&A in the posts comments can be found in the original post by Dean Radin. This may prove to be a very interesting and important experiment.

If it is proven that remote intention can change matter, then it’s a whole new world. This can explain remote healing, micro-psychokinesis and other aspects and effects of psi. 

   

 

 

3 Comments

  1. Figure 4 in the paper shows no difference between the (distant) control group and the intentionally treated group, i.e., no effect.
    So, why are they happy about these results?

  2. Amazing!

  3. thanks for info